According to The Independent, "FIFA 16" is getting good early reviews. It said that the minor changes and new modes added to last year's game make a convincing reason to go for an upgrade. However, the competition with its rival "PES 2016" is still tight and high. And it looks like EA Sports' version is still not tempting enough to invite over new fans. It��s a move that feels overdue, but 2015 is a good year for it nonetheless. The World Cup in Canada catapulted the women��s game to a new level of global prominence, particularly in North America, and the US team��s success will have further helped in what��s arguably FIFA��s biggest untapped market.

Adding women is a non-trivial technical task. The subtle tweaks mentioned earlier all relate to the engine powering the men��s game, which has benefited from years of evolution based on physics and animations designed for male players. Simply swapping the models out wouldn��t work; EA has had to rethink how FIFA plays to accommodate the women��s game. Another thing that I found to be immediately apparent is that the game looks a little better this year. I��ve been playing on PC and Xbox One and have noticed that the aliasing issues and general muddiness of last year��s game have been addressed; everything is sharper and seems to ��pop�� a lot more (I hear that��s the trendy term these days). Since moving to the new engine with FIFA 14, the game has always managed to look both fantastic and terrible at various moments and this year is no exception.

Generally though, things have been tidied up and given some polish; everything seems to be at 60fps this year, compared to last year where I felt that the frame rate would halve during some cutscenes, and it does make a difference. Player models are better but still nowhere near PES levels, although the hair is nice, with the addition of women��s football having led to much more realistically flowing male locks as well as the veritable ponytail fest the ladies provide. People seem to want different things from how football games look, with some much preferring PES��s chunkiness and great looking player models and others opting for FIFA��s wealth of realistically created stadiums and degrading pitches. I think, on the whole, FIFA looks better during gameplay but both have their high and low points.

It��s fifa 16 coins traders a hard thing to make a judgement on and is perhaps one of the dividing factors that makes some people prefer PES and some prefer FIFA. On paper, FIFA��s physics and player attribute factors make it sound like the more in-depth game but in practise it can make for some frustrating moments. PES somehow manages to convey the player identities without having to highlight their foibles quite so much. Players still feel too ��light�� as well; it��s hard to feel that you��re controlling a footballer as they glide effortlessly across the pitch. I don��t know quite what it is but there��s a disconnect somewhere, it might even be that the ball, fifa coins traders as realistic as its movement is, is too light in general. I don��t really know but there��s something intangible that��s still slightly off about the overall feel.